State comparison
This view is designed for fair civic comparison. It shows both fiscal differences and evidence differences so residents can tell whether a “better” state record is actually better sourced.
Primary state
Reasonable comparison
State comparisons currently lean on population and source-coverage similarity.
South Dakota and Connecticut are using the same dashboard model, but both are still limited by state summary coverage.
South Dakota currently has 2 promoted years and 2 parsed docs feeding the record.
Connecticut currently has 2 promoted years and 2 parsed docs feeding the record.
South Dakota
60
/100
Watchlist
Confidence: Medium
Current budget figure
$7.4B
FY2027
Evidence depth
2 years
2 parsed • 2 tracked docs
Latest fiscal year
FY2027
Adopted
$7.4B
Actual
$7.4B
What residents would notice first
The current state record is not complete enough for strong analytical claims yet; use it mainly to inspect sources and coverage gaps.
Largest visible bucket
Pending extraction
Pending
Named initiative
Pending extraction
GovMatrix still needs stronger narrative extraction here.
Connecticut
52
/100
Watchlist
Confidence: Medium
Current budget figure
$27.4B
FY2027
Evidence depth
2 years
2 parsed • 2 tracked docs
Latest fiscal year
FY2027
Adopted
$27.4B
Actual
$27.4B
What residents would notice first
The state record has enough change or coverage gaps that it deserves active follow-up.
Largest visible bucket
Pending extraction
Pending
Named initiative
Pending extraction
GovMatrix still needs stronger narrative extraction here.
Compare the budgets themselves, the quality of the evidence, and the parts of the public story GovMatrix can currently explain.
Bars show year-over-year budget change and parsed-document count. This is intentionally simple: evidence depth matters as much as fiscal movement.
| Metric | South Dakota | Connecticut |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Budget growth | +1.6% | +2040.1% |
| Budget per resident | $8,393 | $7,606 |
| Promoted years | 2 | 2 |
| Parsed docs | 2 | 2 |
| Tracked source docs | 2 | 2 |
| Major services tracked | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Largest visible bucket | Pending extraction | Pending extraction |
| Strongest visible change | Pending extraction | Pending extraction |
South Dakota narrative evidence
Connecticut narrative evidence