State comparison
This view is designed for fair civic comparison. It shows both fiscal differences and evidence differences so residents can tell whether a “better” state record is actually better sourced.
Primary state
Reasonable comparison
State comparisons currently lean on population and source-coverage similarity.
Nebraska and Arizona are using the same dashboard model, but both are still limited by state summary coverage.
Nebraska currently has 1 promoted years and 1 parsed docs feeding the record.
Arizona currently has 1 promoted years and 1 parsed docs feeding the record.
Nebraska
58
/100
Watchlist
Confidence: Medium
Current budget figure
$5.3B
FY2026
Evidence depth
1 years
1 parsed • 1 tracked docs
Latest fiscal year
FY2026
Adopted
$5.3B
Actual
$5.3B
What residents would notice first
The current state record is not complete enough for strong analytical claims yet; use it mainly to inspect sources and coverage gaps.
Largest visible bucket
Pending extraction
Pending
Named initiative
Pending extraction
GovMatrix still needs stronger narrative extraction here.
Arizona
51
/100
Elevated Risk
Confidence: Medium
Current budget figure
$6B
FY2025
Evidence depth
1 years
1 parsed • 1 tracked docs
Latest fiscal year
FY2025
Adopted
$6.0B
Actual
$6.0B
What residents would notice first
The current state record is not complete enough for strong analytical claims yet; use it mainly to inspect sources and coverage gaps.
Largest visible bucket
Pending extraction
Pending
Named initiative
Pending extraction
GovMatrix still needs stronger narrative extraction here.
Compare the budgets themselves, the quality of the evidence, and the parts of the public story GovMatrix can currently explain.
Bars show year-over-year budget change and parsed-document count. This is intentionally simple: evidence depth matters as much as fiscal movement.
| Metric | Nebraska | Arizona |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58/100 | 51/100 |
| Confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Budget growth | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| Budget per resident | $2,698 | $835 |
| Promoted years | 1 | 1 |
| Parsed docs | 1 | 1 |
| Tracked source docs | 1 | 1 |
| Major services tracked | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Largest visible bucket | Pending extraction | Pending extraction |
| Strongest visible change | Pending extraction | Pending extraction |
Nebraska narrative evidence
Arizona narrative evidence