City Comparison

Compare local governments on scores, allocation, risk signals, and confidence.

This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.

Strong comparison

Population size, geography, and source coverage make this a strong like-for-like comparison.

Westminster scores 0 points higher than Aliso Viejo primarily because it shows lower vendor concentration risk, stronger financial stability, fewer anomaly signals.

Aliso Viejo leads by 21 points on vendor risk.

Westminster leads by 11 points on financial stability.

Westminster leads by 7 points on trend / anomaly.

Westminster

66

/100

Watchlist

Confidence: Limited

Reserves are trending upward

Westminster shows an improving reserve direction versus recent years.

Some evidence is still low-confidence

0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.

Budget growth remains near peer range

3.2% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.

Aliso Viejo

66

/100

Watchlist

Confidence: Limited

Some evidence is still low-confidence

0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.

Budget growth remains near peer range

5.0% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.

Score and metric comparison

Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.

Open Westminster dashboard
MetricWestminsterAliso Viejo
GovMatrix score66/10066/100
Administrative overhead24.7%18.6%
Top vendor share14.0%16.8%
Budget growth YoY3.2%5.0%
Budget per resident$1,471$2,692
ConfidenceLimitedLimited

Sub-score breakdown

These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.

Financial Stability

Westminster 82Aliso Viejo 71

Westminster: Improving reserves and 3.2% budget growth shape this pillar.

Aliso Viejo: Stable reserves and 5.0% budget growth shape this pillar.

Spending Efficiency

Westminster 90Aliso Viejo 95

Westminster: 24.7% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Aliso Viejo: 18.6% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Transparency

Westminster 31Aliso Viejo 31

Westminster: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Aliso Viejo: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Vendor Risk

Westminster 73Aliso Viejo 94

Westminster: 14.0% top-vendor share and 1 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Aliso Viejo: 16.8% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Trend / Anomaly

Westminster 89Aliso Viejo 82

Westminster: Public Works is the biggest growth area at 8.0%.

Aliso Viejo: Technology Programs is the biggest growth area at 11.4%.

Public Burden

Westminster 83Aliso Viejo 83

Westminster: $1,470 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Aliso Viejo: $2,692 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Growth and consulting comparison

This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.

Westminster

Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.

Aliso Viejo

Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.