City Comparison

Compare local governments on scores, allocation, risk signals, and confidence.

This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.

Weak comparison

Use this comparison carefully because size or source-coverage differences limit fairness.

Santa Ana scores 4 points higher than Westminster primarily because it shows better source transparency, fewer anomaly signals, stronger financial stability.

Santa Ana leads by 56 points on transparency.

Westminster leads by 35 points on trend / anomaly.

Westminster leads by 14 points on financial stability.

Santa Ana

70

/100

Stable

Confidence: High

Reserves are trending upward

Santa Ana shows an improving reserve direction versus recent years.

Vendor concentration is elevated

22.4% of tracked payments flow to the top vendor, which is above the peer median.

Consulting spend is rising faster than staffing

Outside services growth leads staffing by 12.4 points.

Westminster

66

/100

Watchlist

Confidence: Limited

Reserves are trending upward

Westminster shows an improving reserve direction versus recent years.

Some evidence is still low-confidence

0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.

Budget growth remains near peer range

3.2% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.

Score and metric comparison

Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.

Open Santa Ana dashboard
MetricSanta AnaWestminster
GovMatrix score70/10066/100
Administrative overhead21.0%24.7%
Top vendor share22.4%14.0%
Budget growth YoY-0.7%3.2%
Budget per resident$2,752$1,471
ConfidenceHighLimited

Sub-score breakdown

These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.

Financial Stability

Santa Ana 68Westminster 82

Santa Ana: Improving reserves and -0.7% budget growth shape this pillar.

Westminster: Improving reserves and 3.2% budget growth shape this pillar.

Spending Efficiency

Santa Ana 77Westminster 90

Santa Ana: 21.0% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Westminster: 24.7% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Transparency

Santa Ana 87Westminster 31

Santa Ana: 3/4 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Westminster: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Vendor Risk

Santa Ana 61Westminster 73

Santa Ana: 22.4% top-vendor share and 1 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Westminster: 14.0% top-vendor share and 1 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Trend / Anomaly

Santa Ana 54Westminster 89

Santa Ana: Professional Services is the biggest growth area at 18.4%.

Westminster: Public Works is the biggest growth area at 8.0%.

Public Burden

Santa Ana 82Westminster 83

Santa Ana: $2,751 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Westminster: $1,470 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Growth and consulting comparison

This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.

Santa Ana

3 machine-readable documents and 2 evidence-linked findings back this score.

Westminster

Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.