City Comparison

Compare local governments on scores, allocation, risk signals, and confidence.

This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.

Strong comparison

Population size, geography, and source coverage make this a strong like-for-like comparison.

Irvine scores 3 points higher than Santa Ana primarily because it shows lighter public burden, lower vendor concentration risk, fewer anomaly signals.

Santa Ana leads by 36 points on public burden.

Irvine leads by 30 points on vendor risk.

Irvine leads by 21 points on trend / anomaly.

Santa Ana

70

/100

Stable

Confidence: High

Reserves are trending upward

Santa Ana shows an improving reserve direction versus recent years.

Vendor concentration is elevated

22.4% of tracked payments flow to the top vendor, which is above the peer median.

Consulting spend is rising faster than staffing

Outside services growth leads staffing by 12.4 points.

Irvine

73

/100

Stable

Confidence: High

Reserve trend is moving the wrong way

Reserve direction is declining, which reduces buffer room if revenue slows.

Source coverage is strong

2 documents are parsed and linked into the score context.

Per-resident burden sits above peers

$5,804 per resident is above the peer midpoint.

Score and metric comparison

Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.

Open Santa Ana dashboard
MetricSanta AnaIrvine
GovMatrix score70/10073/100
Administrative overhead21.0%0.0%
Top vendor share22.4%15.1%
Budget growth YoY-0.7%40.4%
Budget per resident$2,752$5,805
ConfidenceHighHigh

Sub-score breakdown

These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.

Financial Stability

Santa Ana 68Irvine 53

Santa Ana: Improving reserves and -0.7% budget growth shape this pillar.

Irvine: Declining reserves and 40.4% budget growth shape this pillar.

Spending Efficiency

Santa Ana 77Irvine 80

Santa Ana: 21.0% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Irvine: 0.0% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Transparency

Santa Ana 87Irvine 82

Santa Ana: 3/4 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Irvine: 2/2 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Vendor Risk

Santa Ana 61Irvine 91

Santa Ana: 22.4% top-vendor share and 1 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Irvine: 15.1% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Trend / Anomaly

Santa Ana 54Irvine 75

Santa Ana: Professional Services is the biggest growth area at 18.4%.

Irvine: Public Safety Operations is the biggest growth area at 9.6%.

Public Burden

Santa Ana 82Irvine 46

Santa Ana: $2,751 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Irvine: $5,804 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Growth and consulting comparison

This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.

Santa Ana

3 machine-readable documents and 2 evidence-linked findings back this score.

Irvine

2 machine-readable documents and 1 evidence-linked findings back this score.