City Comparison
This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.
Weak comparison
Use this comparison carefully because size or source-coverage differences limit fairness.
Anaheim scores 7 points higher than Placentia primarily because it shows lower vendor concentration risk, stronger financial stability, fewer anomaly signals.
Anaheim leads by 28 points on vendor risk.
Anaheim leads by 12 points on financial stability.
Anaheim leads by 12 points on trend / anomaly.
Placentia
55
/100
Watchlist
Confidence: Limited
Reserve trend is moving the wrong way
Reserve direction is declining, which reduces buffer room if revenue slows.
Administrative overhead is elevated
41.2% of tracked spend sits in administrative functions, above the peer baseline.
Vendor concentration is elevated
28.0% of tracked payments flow to the top vendor, which is above the peer median.
Anaheim
62
/100
Watchlist
Confidence: Limited
Administrative overhead is elevated
41.2% of tracked spend sits in administrative functions, above the peer baseline.
Some evidence is still low-confidence
0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.
Budget growth remains near peer range
4.1% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.
Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.
| Metric | Placentia | Anaheim |
|---|---|---|
| GovMatrix score | 55/100 | 62/100 |
| Administrative overhead | 41.2% | 41.2% |
| Top vendor share | 28.0% | 16.8% |
| Budget growth YoY | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Budget per resident | $2,522 | $941 |
| Confidence | Limited | Limited |
These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.
Financial Stability
Placentia 63 • Anaheim 75
Placentia: Declining reserves and 3.2% budget growth shape this pillar.
Anaheim: Stable reserves and 4.1% budget growth shape this pillar.
Spending Efficiency
Placentia 44 • Anaheim 52
Placentia: 41.2% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.
Anaheim: 41.2% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.
Transparency
Placentia 31 • Anaheim 31
Placentia: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.
Anaheim: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.
Vendor Risk
Placentia 66 • Anaheim 94
Placentia: 28.0% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.
Anaheim: 16.8% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.
Trend / Anomaly
Placentia 74 • Anaheim 86
Placentia: Public Works is the biggest growth area at 8.0%.
Anaheim: Community Services is the biggest growth area at 9.7%.
Public Burden
Placentia 82 • Anaheim 75
Placentia: $2,522 per resident frames the current adopted budget.
Anaheim: $940 per resident frames the current adopted budget.
This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.
Placentia
Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.
Anaheim
Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.