City Comparison

Compare local governments on scores, allocation, risk signals, and confidence.

This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.

Weak comparison

Use this comparison carefully because size or source-coverage differences limit fairness.

Irvine scores 7 points higher than Westminster primarily because it shows better source transparency, lighter public burden, stronger financial stability.

Irvine leads by 51 points on transparency.

Westminster leads by 37 points on public burden.

Westminster leads by 29 points on financial stability.

Irvine

73

/100

Stable

Confidence: High

Reserve trend is moving the wrong way

Reserve direction is declining, which reduces buffer room if revenue slows.

Source coverage is strong

2 documents are parsed and linked into the score context.

Per-resident burden sits above peers

$5,804 per resident is above the peer midpoint.

Westminster

66

/100

Watchlist

Confidence: Limited

Reserves are trending upward

Westminster shows an improving reserve direction versus recent years.

Some evidence is still low-confidence

0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.

Budget growth remains near peer range

3.2% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.

Score and metric comparison

Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.

Open Irvine dashboard
MetricIrvineWestminster
GovMatrix score73/10066/100
Administrative overhead0.0%24.7%
Top vendor share15.1%14.0%
Budget growth YoY40.4%3.2%
Budget per resident$5,805$1,471
ConfidenceHighLimited

Sub-score breakdown

These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.

Financial Stability

Irvine 53Westminster 82

Irvine: Declining reserves and 40.4% budget growth shape this pillar.

Westminster: Improving reserves and 3.2% budget growth shape this pillar.

Spending Efficiency

Irvine 80Westminster 90

Irvine: 0.0% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Westminster: 24.7% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Transparency

Irvine 82Westminster 31

Irvine: 2/2 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Westminster: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Vendor Risk

Irvine 91Westminster 73

Irvine: 15.1% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Westminster: 14.0% top-vendor share and 1 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Trend / Anomaly

Irvine 75Westminster 89

Irvine: Public Safety Operations is the biggest growth area at 9.6%.

Westminster: Public Works is the biggest growth area at 8.0%.

Public Burden

Irvine 46Westminster 83

Irvine: $5,804 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Westminster: $1,470 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Growth and consulting comparison

This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.

Irvine

2 machine-readable documents and 1 evidence-linked findings back this score.

Westminster

Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.