City Comparison

Compare local governments on scores, allocation, risk signals, and confidence.

This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.

Weak comparison

Use this comparison carefully because size or source-coverage differences limit fairness.

Irvine scores 7 points higher than Aliso Viejo primarily because it shows better source transparency, lighter public burden, stronger financial stability.

Irvine leads by 51 points on transparency.

Aliso Viejo leads by 37 points on public burden.

Aliso Viejo leads by 18 points on financial stability.

Irvine

73

/100

Stable

Confidence: High

Reserve trend is moving the wrong way

Reserve direction is declining, which reduces buffer room if revenue slows.

Source coverage is strong

2 documents are parsed and linked into the score context.

Per-resident burden sits above peers

$5,804 per resident is above the peer midpoint.

Aliso Viejo

66

/100

Watchlist

Confidence: Limited

Some evidence is still low-confidence

0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.

Budget growth remains near peer range

5.0% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.

Score and metric comparison

Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.

Open Irvine dashboard
MetricIrvineAliso Viejo
GovMatrix score73/10066/100
Administrative overhead0.0%18.6%
Top vendor share15.1%16.8%
Budget growth YoY40.4%5.0%
Budget per resident$5,805$2,692
ConfidenceHighLimited

Sub-score breakdown

These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.

Financial Stability

Irvine 53Aliso Viejo 71

Irvine: Declining reserves and 40.4% budget growth shape this pillar.

Aliso Viejo: Stable reserves and 5.0% budget growth shape this pillar.

Spending Efficiency

Irvine 80Aliso Viejo 95

Irvine: 0.0% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Aliso Viejo: 18.6% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Transparency

Irvine 82Aliso Viejo 31

Irvine: 2/2 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Aliso Viejo: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Vendor Risk

Irvine 91Aliso Viejo 94

Irvine: 15.1% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Aliso Viejo: 16.8% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Trend / Anomaly

Irvine 75Aliso Viejo 82

Irvine: Public Safety Operations is the biggest growth area at 9.6%.

Aliso Viejo: Technology Programs is the biggest growth area at 11.4%.

Public Burden

Irvine 46Aliso Viejo 83

Irvine: $5,804 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Aliso Viejo: $2,692 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Growth and consulting comparison

This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.

Irvine

2 machine-readable documents and 1 evidence-linked findings back this score.

Aliso Viejo

Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.