City Comparison

Compare local governments on scores, allocation, risk signals, and confidence.

This view is for fair benchmarking, not leaderboard theater. The comparison badge reflects whether the cities are actually similar enough for a strong side-by-side read.

Weak comparison

Use this comparison carefully because size or source-coverage differences limit fairness.

Santa Ana scores 4 points higher than Aliso Viejo primarily because it shows better source transparency, lower vendor concentration risk, fewer anomaly signals.

Santa Ana leads by 56 points on transparency.

Aliso Viejo leads by 33 points on vendor risk.

Aliso Viejo leads by 28 points on trend / anomaly.

Aliso Viejo

66

/100

Watchlist

Confidence: Limited

Some evidence is still low-confidence

0 source documents still need review, which limits precision.

Budget growth remains near peer range

5.0% year-over-year growth is not a major outlier within the peer set.

Santa Ana

70

/100

Stable

Confidence: High

Reserves are trending upward

Santa Ana shows an improving reserve direction versus recent years.

Vendor concentration is elevated

22.4% of tracked payments flow to the top vendor, which is above the peer median.

Consulting spend is rising faster than staffing

Outside services growth leads staffing by 12.4 points.

Score and metric comparison

Default metrics favor per-resident or share-of-budget framing over raw dollars.

Open Aliso Viejo dashboard
MetricAliso ViejoSanta Ana
GovMatrix score66/10070/100
Administrative overhead18.6%21.0%
Top vendor share16.8%22.4%
Budget growth YoY5.0%-0.7%
Budget per resident$2,692$2,752
ConfidenceLimitedHigh

Sub-score breakdown

These six pillars make the overall score explainable instead of mystical.

Financial Stability

Aliso Viejo 71Santa Ana 68

Aliso Viejo: Stable reserves and 5.0% budget growth shape this pillar.

Santa Ana: Improving reserves and -0.7% budget growth shape this pillar.

Spending Efficiency

Aliso Viejo 95Santa Ana 77

Aliso Viejo: 18.6% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Santa Ana: 21.0% administrative overhead and consulting growth drive this score.

Transparency

Aliso Viejo 31Santa Ana 87

Aliso Viejo: 0/1 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Santa Ana: 3/4 documents are parsed into the current dataset.

Vendor Risk

Aliso Viejo 94Santa Ana 61

Aliso Viejo: 16.8% top-vendor share and 0 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Santa Ana: 22.4% top-vendor share and 1 no-bid contracts affect this pillar.

Trend / Anomaly

Aliso Viejo 82Santa Ana 54

Aliso Viejo: Technology Programs is the biggest growth area at 11.4%.

Santa Ana: Professional Services is the biggest growth area at 18.4%.

Public Burden

Aliso Viejo 83Santa Ana 82

Aliso Viejo: $2,692 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Santa Ana: $2,751 per resident frames the current adopted budget.

Growth and consulting comparison

This chart highlights whether the overall budget trend and outside-services growth are moving together.

Aliso Viejo

Limited source coverage means the score is heavily compressed toward neutral and should be treated as directional.

Santa Ana

3 machine-readable documents and 2 evidence-linked findings back this score.